lorenfb wrote:
Interesting view points on TMS recently posted, i.e. not the typical "TMS is a must have.".
Those are the people not willing to take a risk on an unproven tech, especially since most of them were, or know someone (through here) that got the bad end of the stick with Nissans early non-TMS battery. I can understand that point of view when talking about buying your next pre-2020 BEV. However if we are going to talk about what is best for the consumer
if this lizard pack shows no more than 10% lost over 5 years in the worst hot areas then ultimately from an engineering point of view TMS isn't needed and that is an advantage.
Saying right now "TMS is a must have" and sticking with it forever is like saying 30 years ago "a crank driven fan is a must have" and ignoring advancements in electric fans and the obvious advantages that they can offer.
Certainly, but it's very unlikely that lacking TMS will provide Tesla-level warm
cold longevity given the same number of cycles on the respective battery packs. As far as I've heard, Lizard has no changes related to cold-range degradation (which is mostly the 50%+ in cold weather range reduction on Leaf v. Tesla's more modest 30% reduction numbers at around 0 F).